Is your medical practice ready for dual coding?
Although medical practices cannot submit medical claims with ICD-10 codes until Oct. 1, there are a few good reasons to start using them sooner.
Those reasons support dual coding — when healthcare organizations assign ICD-10 and ICD-9 codes simultaneously to medical records.
The advantages include:
- Medical coders can practice their ICD-10 knowledge
- Clinical documentation deficiencies are exposed
- Extensive internal and external testing can be done
This won't be cheap. Systems need to be designed for dual coding. And no matter what your vendor promises, dual coding is extra work. That means there will be a productivity loss. Maybe computer assisted coding (CAC) will help. Costs would be associated with:
- Added time
- Maintaining data collection
- Analyzing data
Medical practices likely will need to assign extra coding resources. Extra medical coders can be hired to cover the dual coders. Healthcare providers need to do a cost-benefit analysis to determine if it's better to hire personnel or accept longer reimbursement cycles.
To get dual coding started, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) recommends answering the following questions:
- Can the practice management system (PMS) or electronic health record (EHR) can capture ICD-9 codes and ICD-10 codes in the same patient encounter?
How much dual coding will be done?
- How often?
- How many encounters will be processed?
- Are all diagnoses or just the top X percent of diagnoses are represented?
- Will the ICD-10 codes be captured in the PMS or EHR system or on paper?
Before dual coding can start, a medical practice should:
- Upgrade systems so they are ICD-10 compliant.
- Make sure clinical documentation can support ICD-10 coding.
- Start ICD-10 training and education.
- Test with healthcare vendors or payers.
Then start practicing ICD-10 coding on real cases in the medical practice. Chances are that all this time and money will be investments that payoff after Oct. 1.